Page 1 of 1

Wich one is the MOST shocking and messed up?

Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 1:46 pm
by BlurryFreak
Wich dose you tried so far is the most shocking and messed up? I mean hallucinations, and stuff.

Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 2:52 pm
by f12button
I haven't tried it, but from what i've heard and what it says, Peyote's the most intense.

I gotta try it someday. I'm working my way up, about to do Hash. :)

Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 3:06 pm
by giveaname
definately peyote

Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 11:27 pm
by Ness
If you mean I-Doser, I don't know. If you mean substances, I think its generally accepted that 5-MeO-AMT is the most powerful psychedellic there is.

Posted: Sat Jun 30, 2007 12:15 am
by sicilian
Inhalant is pretty scary.

Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2007 11:44 pm
by Vozige
inhalents like dust off? those fuck you up.... trust me :D

Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2007 12:35 am
by Ness
Why do people do inhalants?

Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 7:10 pm
by Rattlehead
Please, for the love of God do not inhale Dust off, or anything else in your home or anywhere!. Weed is very cheap, if you want to get high, do it safely! Pretty sad when I say weed is safe, but it is compared to the inhalants. Im not being bias, I have tried Dust off a few times, so Im coming from experience. Inhalants deprieve your brain of oxygen, it is very dangerous and can cause death! Please, please, do not risk your lives to feel good.

Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 8:43 pm
by Ness
Er...weed is safe. Any long-term effects dissipate rapidly after you quit using and it's impossible to OD on.

Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 8:47 pm
by Rattlehead
Technically yes, although THC levels in the brain will rise over extended periods of use, it is proven that levels will always return to normal when no longer using(no idea about the time frame). But I believe weed can cause lung cancer, so you can not say weed is harmless.

Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 8:58 pm
by Ness
SMOKING weed causes lung cancer. IMO if one method of ingestion causes problems that another does not, the problems caused by the first method cannot be counted against the substance. It's up to the user to minimize harm. Eating weed does NOT cause lung cancer.

Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 9:21 pm
by Rattlehead
Yeah, but who the hell eats weed to get high? And I'm guessing that could affect the mouth, esophagus, stomach, intestines, liver. I don;t know what point your trying to prove, anything chemically altering the mind is generally not a good thing. If your trying to prove weed is not harmful, I smoked 3 grams one time and went blind for 5 minutes. Tell me that is not a bad thing. I have smoked from .5-7 grams at a time, so this was just a freak circumstance, but why do you keep arguing?

Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 9:25 pm
by Ness
Prohibitionists make outrageous claims about weed, so I have show them up with the facts. Weed is not bad for you. In fact, it REDUCES your risk of various kinds of cancer. If me and other people DON'T keep arguing, then prohibition will never end, and it desperately needs to.

Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2007 7:46 am
by Rattlehead
Well, obviously because I've smoked it, I'm not against it lol.Good luck on your quest to make it legal or whatever your trying to do.

Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 4:35 pm
by ChloeNothing
The only way to DIE from pot is to consume 2 lbs within 20 minutes I think. (They did a test on a tiger where they pumped pot into it's stomach over a period of time to see how long it took for it do die... 20 minutes, two lbs.)