skeptical on use of noise canceling headphones
Posted: Tue Apr 13, 2010 1:19 pm
I've been on the fence with idoser. I downloaded the free computer download that comes with a couple free doses. I didn't have much use of it, but then I prefer to lay down with binaural beats, and a computer just isn't convienant. I was thinking of the iPhone version, when one bit of info caused me some skepticism.
I'm not a skeptic about Binaurual beats... but when I read that i-doser recomends Noise Canceling Headphones... that was a red flag. According to all the greats (like Monroe Institute, etc.) Binaurual beats opperate at frequencies that will be muted or nullified by noise canceling headphones.
It makes sense... after all a noise canceling headphone is nullifying a range of noise - some of which the beats would fall in to.
Yet I see a lot of positive feedback. Since I can't test a free version of idoser on the iphone... i have no real way to test this in a comfortable way.
I'm just wondering if there's an answer out there that logically explains why noise canceling headphones are not degrading the effect.
I've also wondered if users who have no "results" are using said noise canceling headphones.
I'm not a skeptic about Binaurual beats... but when I read that i-doser recomends Noise Canceling Headphones... that was a red flag. According to all the greats (like Monroe Institute, etc.) Binaurual beats opperate at frequencies that will be muted or nullified by noise canceling headphones.
It makes sense... after all a noise canceling headphone is nullifying a range of noise - some of which the beats would fall in to.
Yet I see a lot of positive feedback. Since I can't test a free version of idoser on the iphone... i have no real way to test this in a comfortable way.
I'm just wondering if there's an answer out there that logically explains why noise canceling headphones are not degrading the effect.
I've also wondered if users who have no "results" are using said noise canceling headphones.