Page 1 of 1

how much worse are mp3s than drgs?

Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 12:59 am
by Rylie
I know they're not as good as the real ones, but how much less do they work? it wouldn't be very noticable would it? or does it depend on the does?

Re: how much worse are mp3s than drgs?

Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2011 10:21 pm
by Sloth
Rylie wrote:I know they're not as good as the real ones, but how much less do they work? it wouldn't be very noticable would it? or does it depend on the does?
Well it depends on which one. For me, neither Marijauana one worked, but I felt a more pwoerful dizzyness from the DRG. However, Divinorum on the CD/MP3 is pretty good

Re: how much worse are mp3s than drgs?

Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2011 11:35 pm
by Oblivion9122
It ABSOLUTELY depends on the doses and which ones actually work for you... Like french roast and anesthesia are great MP3 or DRG but some may only work for you in DRG (ie. Acid, alcohol, hash/hashqh). All of this also depends on the user so just use trial and error!

Re: how much worse are mp3s than drgs?

Posted: Mon May 16, 2011 5:08 pm
by TheDoseification
I'd go for the DRGs, because they're more reliable, but if you absolutely don't have access to them (don't have a computer at home, family, no iPhone, etc.) than I'd go for the CDs, seeing as to how CDs have 1411.2 kb/s versus an MP3's mere 320 kb/s.

Re: how much worse are mp3s than drgs?

Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2011 11:30 pm
by dp100
mp3's are easier because of the ambient sound but DRG is more likely to effect you.

Re: how much worse are mp3s than drgs?

Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 5:17 pm
by jairo0023
My friend If you conert them using the V5 premium they should be the Same :) No worries :nod:

Re: how much worse are mp3s than drgs?

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2011 7:13 pm
by dp100
try mp3. if you don't get any effect or not what you want try drg. DRG's are longer so they will give you more time to get into the right state of mind, but mp3's can be easier to not get distracted.

Re: how much worse are mp3s than drgs?

Posted: Sun Aug 21, 2011 12:20 am
by grazman
The only thing I found was different is that the static is much lower on the mp3s. I tried Content and QuickHappy, neither worked. But then again, Content has NEVER worked for me, and QuickHappy has only worked 3 times, all as a drg and less with each dose.

Re: how much worse are mp3s than drgs?

Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2011 11:32 am
by DarkDoser
jairo0023 wrote:My friend If you conert them using the V5 premium they should be the Same :) No worries :nod:

Exactly. Right on, man. If people want to use mp3s then just get the I-Doser Premium program and use it to convert the drg into mp3. :-)

Re: how much worse are mp3s than drgs?

Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2011 11:40 am
by idoser
Not even close to the same. The .drg files used in I-Doser Premium and Free are pure binaurals (just the tones and the carrier noise). When your convert them - same thing, just the tones and carrier noise. Our MP3 packs, CDs, and mobile apps have binaural tones mixed with ambient soundscapes and they are completely different sequences.

Re: how much worse are mp3s than drgs?

Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2011 11:42 am
by DarkDoser
TheDoseification wrote:I'd go for the DRGs, because they're more reliable, but if you absolutely don't have access to them (don't have a computer at home, family, no iPhone, etc.) than I'd go for the CDs, seeing as to how CDs have 1411.2 kb/s versus an MP3's mere 320 kb/s.

Awesome username...how'd you come with it?

Re: how much worse are mp3s than drgs?

Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2011 11:43 am
by DarkDoser
grazman wrote:The only thing I found was different is that the static is much lower on the mp3s. I tried Content and QuickHappy, neither worked. But then again, Content has NEVER worked for me, and QuickHappy has only worked 3 times, all as a drg and less with each dose.

Try using Condition before you use a dose...it might help the dose work better on you.

Re: how much worse are mp3s than drgs?

Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2011 11:47 pm
by grazman
I've tried it many times, doesn't seem to work for me. Alpha is pretty much the only one I've tried so far that has worked fully, except for the first time I used quickhappy, even WITH Conditioning.

Re: how much worse are mp3s than drgs?

Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2011 8:12 am
by Dr.google
I use the mp3's from the drg files (from pro program) i prefer the pure beats with no beats, its easier not to be distracted.

Re: how much worse are mp3s than drgs?

Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 8:35 am
by trleft
Some doses really DO NOT have an effect when converted to mp3. for exapmle Quick happy works just fine when converted. I've even busted out laughing using the mp3. But I have tried Hand of God (one of the most powerful dose) and had NO EFFECT when listening to the mp3.
Of course it could always be the certain music player that makes it less effective. You just never know :retard: