how much worse are mp3s than drgs?

Discuss MP3 doses
Post Reply
Rylie
Level 2 (20-29)
Level 2 (20-29)
Posts: 23
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2011 5:14 am

how much worse are mp3s than drgs?

Post by Rylie »

I know they're not as good as the real ones, but how much less do they work? it wouldn't be very noticable would it? or does it depend on the does?
Sloth
Level 4 (50-199)
Level 4 (50-199)
Posts: 113
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 3:32 pm

Re: how much worse are mp3s than drgs?

Post by Sloth »

Rylie wrote:I know they're not as good as the real ones, but how much less do they work? it wouldn't be very noticable would it? or does it depend on the does?
Well it depends on which one. For me, neither Marijauana one worked, but I felt a more pwoerful dizzyness from the DRG. However, Divinorum on the CD/MP3 is pretty good
Oblivion9122
Level 0 (<10)
Level 0 (<10)
Posts: 4
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 11:22 pm

Re: how much worse are mp3s than drgs?

Post by Oblivion9122 »

It ABSOLUTELY depends on the doses and which ones actually work for you... Like french roast and anesthesia are great MP3 or DRG but some may only work for you in DRG (ie. Acid, alcohol, hash/hashqh). All of this also depends on the user so just use trial and error!
TheDoseification
Level 2 (20-29)
Level 2 (20-29)
Posts: 25
Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2011 12:54 pm

Re: how much worse are mp3s than drgs?

Post by TheDoseification »

I'd go for the DRGs, because they're more reliable, but if you absolutely don't have access to them (don't have a computer at home, family, no iPhone, etc.) than I'd go for the CDs, seeing as to how CDs have 1411.2 kb/s versus an MP3's mere 320 kb/s.
dp100
Level 4 (50-199)
Level 4 (50-199)
Posts: 148
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 10:31 pm

Re: how much worse are mp3s than drgs?

Post by dp100 »

mp3's are easier because of the ambient sound but DRG is more likely to effect you.
jairo0023
Level 3 (30-49)
Level 3 (30-49)
Posts: 41
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2011 6:27 pm

Re: how much worse are mp3s than drgs?

Post by jairo0023 »

My friend If you conert them using the V5 premium they should be the Same :) No worries :nod:
dp100
Level 4 (50-199)
Level 4 (50-199)
Posts: 148
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 10:31 pm

Re: how much worse are mp3s than drgs?

Post by dp100 »

try mp3. if you don't get any effect or not what you want try drg. DRG's are longer so they will give you more time to get into the right state of mind, but mp3's can be easier to not get distracted.
grazman
Level 2 (20-29)
Level 2 (20-29)
Posts: 23
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 1:47 am

Re: how much worse are mp3s than drgs?

Post by grazman »

The only thing I found was different is that the static is much lower on the mp3s. I tried Content and QuickHappy, neither worked. But then again, Content has NEVER worked for me, and QuickHappy has only worked 3 times, all as a drg and less with each dose.
DarkDoser
Level 4 (50-199)
Level 4 (50-199)
Posts: 50
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 7:47 pm

Re: how much worse are mp3s than drgs?

Post by DarkDoser »

jairo0023 wrote:My friend If you conert them using the V5 premium they should be the Same :) No worries :nod:

Exactly. Right on, man. If people want to use mp3s then just get the I-Doser Premium program and use it to convert the drg into mp3. :-)
idoser
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 1043
Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 5:00 pm

Re: how much worse are mp3s than drgs?

Post by idoser »

Not even close to the same. The .drg files used in I-Doser Premium and Free are pure binaurals (just the tones and the carrier noise). When your convert them - same thing, just the tones and carrier noise. Our MP3 packs, CDs, and mobile apps have binaural tones mixed with ambient soundscapes and they are completely different sequences.
DarkDoser
Level 4 (50-199)
Level 4 (50-199)
Posts: 50
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 7:47 pm

Re: how much worse are mp3s than drgs?

Post by DarkDoser »

TheDoseification wrote:I'd go for the DRGs, because they're more reliable, but if you absolutely don't have access to them (don't have a computer at home, family, no iPhone, etc.) than I'd go for the CDs, seeing as to how CDs have 1411.2 kb/s versus an MP3's mere 320 kb/s.

Awesome username...how'd you come with it?
DarkDoser
Level 4 (50-199)
Level 4 (50-199)
Posts: 50
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 7:47 pm

Re: how much worse are mp3s than drgs?

Post by DarkDoser »

grazman wrote:The only thing I found was different is that the static is much lower on the mp3s. I tried Content and QuickHappy, neither worked. But then again, Content has NEVER worked for me, and QuickHappy has only worked 3 times, all as a drg and less with each dose.

Try using Condition before you use a dose...it might help the dose work better on you.
grazman
Level 2 (20-29)
Level 2 (20-29)
Posts: 23
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 1:47 am

Re: how much worse are mp3s than drgs?

Post by grazman »

I've tried it many times, doesn't seem to work for me. Alpha is pretty much the only one I've tried so far that has worked fully, except for the first time I used quickhappy, even WITH Conditioning.
Dr.google
Level 1 (10-19)
Level 1 (10-19)
Posts: 13
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2011 11:48 pm

Re: how much worse are mp3s than drgs?

Post by Dr.google »

I use the mp3's from the drg files (from pro program) i prefer the pure beats with no beats, its easier not to be distracted.
trleft
Level 0 (<10)
Level 0 (<10)
Posts: 4
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 9:41 pm

Re: how much worse are mp3s than drgs?

Post by trleft »

Some doses really DO NOT have an effect when converted to mp3. for exapmle Quick happy works just fine when converted. I've even busted out laughing using the mp3. But I have tried Hand of God (one of the most powerful dose) and had NO EFFECT when listening to the mp3.
Of course it could always be the certain music player that makes it less effective. You just never know :retard:
Post Reply